About PropFirmPicker
PropFirmPicker exists because the headline number in this market is nearly useless. Almost every firm here advertises a ninety percent profit split, so the split cannot be what separates them, and it is not: what separates them is the rule that ends the evaluation before any split applies, and that rule is described in a paragraph further down the page in language that differs firm to firm. This site does one thing. It fetches each firm's own pages, quotes the profit split, the advertised evaluation fee, the drawdown rule and the payout cadence exactly as printed, records the date it was read and a hash of the page text at that moment, and puts them side by side. Nothing is scored, ranked, averaged or estimated. Where a firm publishes a range, the range is what appears. Where a firm's site does not answer us, it is listed as unread with the reason rather than filled in from a press release, and five firms are in that state today, including Apex Trader Funding, which is one of the largest in the market. Saying so is the point: a comparison that quietly drops the firms it cannot read is telling you it is complete when it is not.
Why this site exists
There is nothing to buy here. The site may earn a commission if a reader opens an evaluation with a firm after following a link, and links that can pay are marked, but a commission cannot change a cell, because every cell is a quotation that the ingest re-checks against the live page and fails on rather than shipping stale. No firm pays for placement, for a position or for a rule class, and none has been offered one.
Who it is for
A retail futures trader in the United States about to pay an evaluation fee, or who has just failed one and is deciding where to try next
Somebody who already knows what a funded evaluation is and wants the rule that ends it, not an explanation of the concept
Not an institutional trader, not somebody looking for a broker, and not somebody who wants to be told what to trade
What it does not do
- No pass rates and no earnings claims: the published figures in this industry do not support a claim that a funded account is likely to make money, and this site would have no way to verify one if they did
- No ranking by anything except published terms: firms are grouped by the rule they print, never ordered by what they pay us, and there is no score
- No figure without its source and its date: every cell is a quotation the ingest re-checks against the live page, and a firm that reprices makes the run fail rather than leaving a stale number on the page
- No silent omission: five firms cannot be read from our infrastructure today, including Apex Trader Funding, and they are named on the page with the reason instead of being left out
- No CFD or spot-FX prop offer, in any market: that is a different product under a different regime and it is absent here rather than narrowed
What is on this site
1 guides, each with its sources on the page , 55 answers to the questions around them , and the comparison.
- Best prop firms for futures: Most lists of the best prop firms for futures are ordered by what pays the person writing them.
Where the figures come from
Each firm's own published pages, read 2026-09-09; every figure is quoted verbatim and hash-pinned at retrieval.
Who answers for it
Joseph Ellul, Publisher of PropFirmPicker; the person who runs the catalogue ingest, reads every correction sent from this site and answers it.
Reach us
Contact for a question about the site, or hello@propfirmpicker.com. The legal terms are on Terms and Privacy.