People searching for a static drawdown prop firm are usually looking for one thing: a loss limit that does not creep up behind them as they make money. This page gives the verifiable answer rather than a list, because the verifiable answer is more useful than a confident one assembled from sources that cannot be checked.
What we checked, and what we found
This site fetches each firm's own pages and quotes them verbatim. Across the ten firms whose sites answer us, not one publishes the phrase static drawdown anywhere we could read. What they publish instead, in six cases, is an end-of-day drawdown. That is a real and meaningful alternative to a trailing rule, and for most people searching this phrase it is probably what they want, but it is not static and calling it static would misdescribe the product.
The end-of-day firms, which are the practical answer
Take Profit Trader publishes end-of-day drawdown with no buffer requirement. Tradeify publishes end-of-day drawdowns among what you get. Bulenox publishes an end-of-day option whose loss limit moves only once a day, at the close, on realised profit, beside a trailing option, and TradeDay lets you choose between intraday and end of day. If your reason for wanting static is that a trailing limit ended your last evaluation on a peak you never banked, an end-of-day rule addresses that directly.
The firms we cannot read, which may change the answer
Apex Trader Funding, Elite Trader Funding and TickTickTrader return HTTP 403 to our requests, and Funded Futures Network and Pure Futures do not answer at all. Any of them may publish a static rule. We do not list them because we cannot verify them, and a comparison that fills gaps with unverifiable claims is worse than one that names its gaps. If a firm outside this index advertises a static drawdown, ask for the rule in writing and check whether it means static or end-of-day.
Questions people ask about static drawdown prop firm
Which prop firm has a static drawdown?
None that we can verify. No firm in this index publishes the term on any page we can read, and we do not repeat claims we cannot check against a live page.
Is an end-of-day drawdown good enough?
It solves the specific problem most people are avoiding, which is a limit that rises on unrealised profit during a trade. It still moves once a day on realised profit, so it is not equivalent to a fixed level.
Why not just list what review sites say?
Because those figures cannot be re-checked, and prop firm terms change without notice. Every cell on this site is a quotation matched against the live page at ingest, and a cell we cannot fill stays empty and says why.